-
Formal validity of an arbitration agreement is closely linked to the consent of the parties to arbitration. The requirement of arbitration agreement in written form is intended to ensure that the parties actually agreed on resolving the dispute through arbitration. Therefore, matters related to the performance of formal requirements of arbitration agreement and the necessary approval for arbitration, expressed under the arbitration agreement, are often interrelated and jointly approached. In accordance with the Convention of New-York (1958), the arbitration agreement enforcement, and of any other decision, requires an arbitration agreement concluded in writing. The formal requirements do not necessarily promote legal certainty, frequently being sources of circumstantial disputes. For these reasons, the requirement of arbitration agreement in written form, in most national laws and under the Convention in New York, was more liberally construed. In any case, the requirements of the arbitration agreement to be concluded in written form should be construed more dynamically, in the light of modern means of communication. -
Where other civil parties call for broadening the effect of declared appeal on the criminal side of the case and on other civil parties, and as far as conditions applying the extensive effect of the appeal are fulfilled, the judicial review court is bound to give effect to the provisions of Art. 373 in the C. Cr. Pr., obviously complying with the principle of non reformatio in pejus. The author argues that a contrary approach would be vulnerable and devoid of legal grounds, intended to set off the extensive effect of appeal from its purposes, which basically leads to the functional requirement of a court of appeal, consisting in examination of the case by extension, to be circumscribed to appeal statements. Thus, argues the author, it would add unacceptably to the law by way of interpretation, contrary to the principle of ubi lex non distinguit nec nos distinguere debemus.
-
In this study the author examines the legal institution of the politics-related conviction from various points of view: legal nature, regulatory manner, effects, similarities and differences to the causes removing criminal liability or consequences of conviction.
-
Article 322 section 5, second phrase of the (Romanian) Code of Civil Procedure provides that review of a final and binding decision in the Appellate Court or non-appealed and of a ruling passed by a court of last resort upon merits called forth may be requested „whether, following the rendering of the decision, a court order which grounded the decision under review claimed was abated or amended.” The author, in light of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, considers that the purport should be interpreted narrowly. Accordingly, the scope of Article 322 section 5, second phrase of the (Romanian) Code of Civil Procedure may cover uncertified court orders exclusively (referred to as binding) because only these can be amended / abated under appeal or recourse, and not judgments passed within right of review procedures such as review or appeal for annulment, on account of complying with the principle of legal certainty.
