-
The company’s entry into insolvency proceedings may be the result of an unfavourable economic situation or the abusive or negligent attitude of the governing bodies may contribute to this outcome. Sometimes people outside the company may have exercised a direct or indirect control of the company’s activities and be liable for insolvency. In these last hypotheses, the legislator chose to sanction insolvency peers who are held patrimonial alongside the insolvent society in order to satisfy creditors’ claims. As a rule, the former statutory administrator is the one who is called upon to respond to the mismanagement of the company’s business. Taking responsibility for this person implies the making of a claim for property liability which is the subject of a separate litigation in the company’s insolvency proceedings. This distinct dispute is settled in a contradictory procedure, with the administration of evidence in order to establish the meeting of the conditions of civil liability under Article 169 of the Law No 85/2014. When, prior to the opening of insolvency proceedings or during the course of the proceedings, whether or not an application for the liability of the statutory administrator was initiated, the question arises as to what happens when the death of the statutory administrator occurs. Such a request to obtain a patrimonial response in conflict with the heirs of the predecessor administrator may be made or continued or the liability is limited to the person of the deceased and a decision cannot be made to order the successors to answer for de cujus clerical errors. -
Given that the new General Data Protection Regulation has influenced most of the industrial sectors, new challenges in life science area have also been generated, particularly those regarding the effective protection of the personal data of the patients – subjects to clinical trials. The new changes focus mainly on how data and the rights of the data subjects are perceived by these persons, as well as the controllers and processors. This study aims to identify and determine the impact of this regulation on clinical trials and patient engagement policies, having also into consideration the derogations from the rights of data subjects for the purpose of scientific research. Also, we seek to define concepts such as sensitive data, health data, clinical trial data, the obtained results following the clinical trials, data processing, as well as notions related to the parties involved – either the patients or CROs (contract research organizations) understood through the meaning of the terms of natural person or controller, processor, recipient respectively. We want to clarify to what extent the clinical trials can be included in the scientific research that the Regulation refers to and whether its application in this area makes a distinction between the goals of the research: either the one of profit-making or the one of developing the medical knowledge.
-
The present analysis was carried out in order to clarify the situation in which the heads of claim do not have a clear and justified correspondent with the arguments presented in the statement of claim, as well as possible procedural solutions which can resolve such an issue. From the sources analyzed so far, it appears that there is no straight forward solution for this situation neither in the legal provisions, case law or speciality lectures. The premise of our study consists in the situation in which a claimant submits a request containing only one head of claim, although the content of the statement of claim includes also arguments and grounds which are not related to the one and only head of claim which was mentioned in the application, because they refer to different legal topics which are not properly expressed at the beginning of the statement of claim, as head of claim. The present analysis concerns the issues arising from the above mentioned situation both for the claimant and defendant, but also which are the remedies at their hand if such situations will occur. In addition to this, the study presents also the remedies available from the courts’ perspective if such a situation appears in different phases of the trial, but also the consequences of this situation if the issue is not addressed properly by the parties or by the court before the issuance of the court ruling.
-
By the Decision No 369 of 30 May 2017, the Constitutional Court has declared as unconstitutional the phrase „as well as in other cash assessable claims worth up to ROL 1 000 000 inclusive”, included in Article XVIII (2) of the Law No 2/2013 on some measures to relieve the courts, as well as for preparing the implementation of the Law No 134/2010 on the Civil Procedure Code and has stated that „all judgments pronounced after the publication of this Decision in the Official Gazette of Romania, in the applications that are assessable in cash, less those exempted according to the criterion of matter, shall be subject to review”. Subsequently, the High Court of Cassation and Justice, by the Decision No 52/2018, has established that „the effects of the Decision of the Constitutional Court No 369 of 30 May 2017 are produced in respect of the judgments pronounced after its publication in the Official Gazette of Romania, in the litigations assessable in cash up to ROL 1 000 000 inclusive, initiated after the publication of the decision (20 July 2017)”.
-
The solution given by the Constitutional Court of Romania through its Decision No 358/2018 on the legal conflict of a constitutional nature between the Minister of Justice and the President of Romania, regarding the possibility of revoking the Chief Prosecutor of the National Anticorruption Directorate, as a result of which it acknowledged a „power of decision” on the part of the Minister of Justice on prosecutors’ activity, is based on the interpretation of the constitutional text provided by Article 132 (1), according to which public prosecutors shall carry out their activity under the authority of the Minister of Justice. This particular legal provision was interpreted by the Constitutional Court by applying the historical interpretation method, by expressly referring to the will of the original constituent, from which it could not digress without exceeding the limits of its interpretation operation and thus interfering with the law making process, in the Court’s opinion. But what are the limits of legal interpretation? How did the Constitutional Court justify its option for the historical interpretation approach? Is this historical interpretation static or dynamic, evolutive kind? Could the constitutional text have been interpreted from an evolutive perspective? But even so, did the Court make a just historical interpretation of the constitutional text? What are the solutions envisaged and how can the Constitutional Court fulfil its rightful role in a rule of law state?
-
This article investigates how the postcommunist Romanian political regime was defined, with particular emphasis on the settlement of legal conflicts of a constitutional nature through the decisions of the Constitutional Court. Through this research we aim to identify the successive incarnations of the political regime, having as a reference the dynamics of the postcommunist Romanian political regime in relation to the continuous and varied relationship of the forces of political actors, as well as to the way in which they interpret and apply the constitutional norms. The originality of this research lies in the fact that in the analysis of the Romanian political regime we will combine the normative-institutional perspective with the perspective of the political and institutional practice, in order to obtain a complex picture, overall, on the way of formation and articulation of the Romanian political regime. The article highlights a permanent evolution of the political regime in relation to the continuous and varied relations determined by the forces relations of the political actors, as well as by the way in which the constitutional rules are interpreted and applied by them. The intrusion into the Constitutional Court’s jurisprudence in settling legal conflicts of a constitutional nature confirms the analysis of the political scientist Giovanni Sartori, according to which the alternation of the nature of the post-communist Romanian political regime is determined by the political and institutional practice built in relation to the political relationship between the president and the parliamentary majority. Defining the nature of the Romanian political regime helps us to understand the dynamics and frequency of constitutional crises
-
This second part of the study addressing the legal regime of the exception of unconstitutionality and the impact of such legal instrument on ensuring the constitutional order focuses on the admissibility conditions of requests to refer an exception of unconstitutionality to the Constitutional Court of Romania as well as the grounds for finding an exception of unconstitutionality inadmissible. In this context, there is strong emphasis placed on divergent case law approaches, which seems symptomatic for a certain „eccentric” tendency of construing the long-standing type of constitutional review enshrined in the Romanian Constitution. The conclusions of the study suggest the need for giving careful consideration to the manner of tackling such referrals to the Constitutional Court so as to remain in line with the structural requirements relating to the constitutional review as enshrined in our fundamental law.
-
On 24 May 2018, the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova adopted the Law of RM No 85/2018 „For amending and supplementing the Labour Code of the Republic of Moldova No 154/2003”, aimed at adjusting the national legislation to Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies. Thanks to these additions, operated in the Labour Code of the Republic of Moldova (hereinafter – the CM of RM), the Moldavian legislator has expressly enshrined the institution of collective redundancy. The present study aims at the multi-faceted elucidation of the legal regime of collective redundancy in the light of national legislation, of the European standards, as well as of doctrinal opinions. The identification and configuration of the circumstances and of the data underlying this research helped the authors of the study to scientifically elucidate the concept of collective redundancy and to determine the general procedure for its accomplishment.
-
This study is an analysis of the conditions of admissibility by the procedure covered by Article 56 of the Law No 254/2013 of complaints made by the convicted persons in connection with the awarding of compensation days for inadequate conditions of accommodation and the cancellation of the wage garnishment, measure set up by the tax enforcement bodies in order to recover judicial expenses due to the state by those persons. I have chosen to analyse these two situations in the context in which the judge of surveillance of deprivation of liberty is increasingly faced with such complaints from private persons deprived of liberty claiming violation of rights as a result of the application of these two measures. For the presentation of legal problems and the situation I used national case law of judges of surveillance of deprivation of liberty, but also the national case law of the courts.
-
In this analysis, the author carries out a study of the continued offence regulated by the Criminal Code of Romania, covering both theoretical and practical aspects, proposing different solutions in the determination of legal classifications according to the concrete circumstances of the cases. The analysis proceeds from the regulatory framework of the continued offence, continues with doctrinal references and argues or counter-argues with its own arguments, expressing the author’s own opinion. Particularly, when the conditions of the continued offence are analyzed, the one that regards the factual homogeneity of the material acts that form the legal unity of the offence is emphasized.
