COMPETENȚA JUDECĂTORULUI DE SUPRAVEGHERE A PRIVĂRII DE LIBERTATE DE A DISPUNE APLICAREA PRIN PROCEDURA REGLEMENTATĂ DE ART. 56 DIN LEGEA NR. 254/2013 PRIVIND EXECUTAREA PEDEPSELOR ȘI A MĂSURILOR PRIVATIVE DE LIBERTATE A DISPOZIȚIILOR LEGII NR. 169/2017 ȘI DE ANULARE A MĂSURII POPRIRII ÎNFIINȚATE DE CĂTRE AGENȚIA NAȚIONALĂ DE ADMINISTRARE FISCALĂ ASUPRA CONTURILOR UNOR PERSOANE PRIVATE DE LIBERTATE

This study is an analysis of the conditions of admissibility by the procedure covered by Article 56 of the Law No 254/2013 of complaints made by the convicted persons in connection with the awarding of compensation days for inadequate conditions of accommodation and the cancellation of the wage garnishment, measure set up by the tax enforcement bodies in order to recover judicial expenses due to the state by those persons.

I have chosen to analyse these two situations in the context in which the judge of surveillance of deprivation of liberty is increasingly faced with such complaints from private persons deprived of liberty claiming violation of rights as a result of the application of these two measures.

For the presentation of legal problems and the situation I used national case law of judges of surveillance of deprivation of liberty, but also the national case law of the courts.