The new regulation pertaining to business administration in the new Romanian Civil Code, much more detailed than the previous one, springs from the Civil Code of Québec. In Québec, the relevant legal framework provides for an original configuration of this source of obligations, imposing on it the condition of opportunity of the administration actions initiated by the administrator. Subject to this regulation are also the effects of inopportune administration, which aims at restoring the advantage brought to the person administered, without stating the legal grounds of such obligation, aspect which triggers questions to which this paper intends to answer, visiting, among others, other codification proposals on the law of obligations and relevant doctrine in this matter. At the same time, a theoretical definition is laid down for business administration, more nuanced than those elaborated after the new Romanian Civil Code has taken effect, definition which tends to be closer to the meaning of the new normative provisions.

This paper mainly includes a critical analysis of the provisions of the Law No 4/2008, made from the perspective of the political and legislative technique exigencies. Subsidiarily, the paper contains a presentation of the sports policy, as it is promoted by the European bodies and by most of the Western European states.

In this study, the author examines the problems of granting in Romania the subsidiary protection for the asylum seekers in case of generalized violence in situations of armed conflict, stating that, according to the internal and international legal terminology, the subsidiary protection is a form of international protection from which the asylum seekers can benefit. In this respect there are presented: the legal framework – international, European and internal – in the matter, as well as the conditions of granting the protection in question for the asylum seekers in case of generalized violence in situations of armed conflict.

The study reiterates, in other aspects, the previously conducted analysis of the autonomy of the labour law, having in view the preamble of a civil decision of the 7th Division for cases concerning labour and social insurance disputes, within the Court of Appeal of Bucharest. This preamble also states: „The provisions of the Civil Code have nature of general law, representing the common law in the matter of civil legal relations in a broader sense, a matter where the labour relations are also included.” This study shows that, if such a statement would be retained, this would mean to accept implicitly the inexistence of autonomy of the labour law. As a result, it briefly analyzes the main specific features of the labour relations compared to the civil ones, reiterating that the labour law is a mixed branch of law, autonomous, but not independent from the civil law, a component of the private law. The rules of the civil law apply, as rules of common law, only subsidiarily, in the absence of some specific regulations of labour law and unless this is contrary to the particularities of the legal labour relations.

Within this study, the author has analyzed, in the light of the new Fiscal Procedure Code and also of the current one, the forms of the sanction of the fiscal obligation and the mechanism of their operation depending on the category of creditors that may be, on the one hand, the fiscal bodies, and, on the other hand, the taxpayers that are entitled to the refund or the reimbursement of some amounts from the public budget. Similarly, the author has made the necessary distinctions between the types of sanctions depending on whether the fiscal claims pertain to the central budget or to the local budget. Finally, the author has analyzed the modalities of granting the delay interests for the failure to refund the amounts from the budget due to the taxpayers depending on the cause which has generated these fiscal claims, respectively the fault of the fiscal bodies or of the taxpayers themselves.

The article analyzes the facultative jurisdiction of the court seized with an application promoted by a judge, a prosecutor, a registrar, a legal assistant, who act as plaintiffs in an application for which the court where they carry on their activity has jurisdiction. The analysis focuses on the meaning and the interpretation of the phrase „court where they carry on their activity”.