Loading...
  • This article aims to analyze a recent normative act through that were amended and supplemented the normative acts in matters of education, respectively, the Law on national education No 1/2011 and the Government Emergency Ordinance No 75/2005 on quality assurance in education. The approach is focused both on procedural aspects of the adoption of administrative act, in order to determine how the constitutional requirements have been met, but also on the substantive issues, that aim some of the legislative solutions which it enshrines. Among them, the article paid a special attention to the consecration, for the first time in the Romanian legislation, of the possibility that the holder of a scientific title can give up to it. In our opinion, the newly introduced rule has some weaknesses, both in terms of how it is written, but also on the legitimacy of the solution itself.
  • In the Romanian doctrine, even if it is evoked the legal existence of the „right to a name”, most authors define it as if it were identical to the „name”. Likewise, some of its legal characters are just asserted, and others are logically and legally grounded in a questionable manner. In relation to this „situation”, this study is devoted to the argumentation and phrasing of a variant of „definition” for the „right to a name”, as well as to the „nuancing” of its legal characters.
  • Din economia dispozițiilor art. 1349 din noul Cod civil reiese faptul că orice persoană are îndatorirea să respecte regulile de conduită pe care legea sau obiceiul locului le impune și să nu aducă atingere, prin acțiunile ori inacțiunile sale, drepturilor sau intereselor legitime ale altor persoane; cel care, având discernământ, încalcă această îndatorire răspunde de toate prejudiciile cauzate, fiind obligat să le repare integral.
  • The current standards on the quality, the integrity and the non-disclosure of the professional secret in the interprofessional complementary activities of the Romanian judicial system represent, in the contemporary society, a concern to adjust to the permanently changing reality. The existence of some constants such as independence, competence, responsibility, but also honour, dignity and respect, in reality, receives new meanings, and their convergence is achieved only by way of a various communication. Creating some new modalities to ensure the common professional status is not an illusion, but a real need for the interprofessional dialogue to take place not only within a profession, but within more professions, for the purpose of ensuring the unity in the application of law.
  • In the matter of conditions of application of the preventive arrest measure, as in the case of other institutions, the new Criminal Procedure Code contains new regulations and takes over, to a small extent, some provisions of the previous Criminal Procedure Code (of 1968). The new Criminal Procedure Code has regulated the preventive detention in a single modality: the detention of the defendant, namely of the person against whom the criminal action has been set in motion. In this study, the authors analyze the institution of preventive detention, with special reference to the conditions of application of this measure, by presenting some critical aspects and by proposing some improvements of the new regulation. Key
  • At first sight, guilt appears as being one of the necessary conditions for engaging liability, which is quite easy to determine. In fact, in order to make such a statement it must be considered the structure of guilt, formed not only of the intellective and volitive factors that make up the complex psychological process which stands at the origin of the illicit activity, but also the imputation which can be brought to the agent for a conduct inconsistent with the rigours imposed by the legal order. By the analysis made, the author of this study has emphasized both the strengths, and the disadvantages of the criteria subjectively, objectively and even intermediately used for determining the civil guilt in concrete situations. Likewise, he has also dealt with the possibility of determining the criminal guilt in the light of the psychological and normative conceptions. At the same time, by expressing his options for some of these, the author has proposed some nuancings in order to obtain some results as precise as possible and, at the same time, fair for all parties involved.
  • Both at Community level and at national level, there is the concern to allow the employees the possibility of a conciliation of the professional life with the private life, one of the measures regulated in this respect being the leave for raising a child, provided by the Government Emergency Ordinance No 111/2010. The exercise of this right can not be a reason to treat the employee differently or to affect his professional evolution, as the law guarantees the stability of the labour relation for the duration of the leave and subsequently, as well as the right to be reinstated to the same position or to an equivalent one. However, the national legislation also contains provisions which are lacking clarity, does not fully transpose the Community law in the field, so that it is required an improvement of this legislation and a greater flexibility in regulating of the situation of the labour relation for the duration of the leave for raising a child.
  • Promoting a public „good governance” involves the rationalisation of the manner of functioning of the state and of the instruments used, among which there are those of a normative nature. The proliferation of legal rules – at national level, at European Union level and at international level – is today a general phenomenon, generating costs – legal, administrative, economic and others – more burdensome for the individual and for the entire society. The remedy for this situation is simplification, under its various aspects – administrative simplification, simplification of the legal language or of the legislative techniques –, an old method frequently used, however a new concept trying to stand out in the field of legal theory. The simplification of law as legal-administrative action has undergone various national and EU experiences. These have accredited a series of principles of conduct, have set targets to be attained and have promoted specific methods and techniques for achieving them.
  • The right of the creditor to request the opening of the insolvency procedure is one of the modalities which the legislator has made available to the creditor in order to materialize his claim right held against his debtor. The opening of the insolvency procedure does not have the characteristic of a proper enforcement, whereas insolvency does not offer to the creditor the guarantee of actual satisfaction of the claim right held against the debtor. The creditor entitled to request the opening of the insolvency procedure must have held against its debtor a certain, liquid and exigible claim for more than 60 days, which shall have the minimum amount set by the law. This study intends to analyze the characters of the claim of a creditor entitled to request the opening of the insolvency procedure, respectively the certain, liquid and exigible character.
  • In this study the author analyzes, on the one hand, the scope of application of the provisions of the Government Emergency Ordinance No 34/2014, and, on the other hand, the consumer rights in contracts concluded with professionals which fall within the scope of application of the mentioned Ordinance. We note that the Government Emergency Ordinance No 34/2014 on the consumer rights within contracts concluded with professionals transposes, into the Romanian legislation, the provisions of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, published in the Official Journal of the European Union, L 304 of 22 November 2011.
  • Juvenile deprivation of liberty is a controversial issue, in particular because the measure is in opposition to the educative goal of juvenile justice. Detention of children is a more acute problem. In Switzerland, although pre-trial – as well as administrative (immigration law) – detention of children under the age of 15 are prohibited, they are inappropriately decided by courts and authorities. The article describes the situation, its legal frame and has a critical look at such practice and decisions.
Folosim fisierele tip cookie-uri pentru a va oferi cea mai buna experienta de utilizare a website-ului. Navigand in continuare ori ramanand doar pe aceasta pagina va exprimati acordul asupra folosirii cookie-urilor. Daca doriti sa renuntati la acestea, va rugam sa consultati Politica de Utilizare a Cookie-urilor. Anumite parti ale website-ului nu vor mai functiona corect daca stergeti toate cookie-urile. Citește mai mult... Ok

Facilități pentru abonarea online la Revista Dreptul

Autori de prestigiu. Subiecte practice și de actualitate disponibile online

UNIUNEA JURIŞTILOR DIN ROMÂNIA 

Bucureşti, sector 1, Bd. G-ral Gheorghe Magheru, nr. 22, et. 1 

CIF 1576959, Dosar 27/PJ/22.10.1993 

IBAN RO16BRDE410SV21865234100 Banca BRD 

 

 

OFERTĂ revista "DREPTUL"  pentru anul 2026

 

UNIUNEA JURIŞTILOR DIN ROMÂNIA, cu sediul in localitatea București, bd. G-ral Gheorghe Magheru, nr. 22, et. 1, sectorul 1, cod fiscal 1576959, reprezentată legal prin domnul Chelaru Ioan, în calitate de Președinte, vă comunică oferta de preț la revista „Dreptul” valabilă pentru anul 2026: 

 

  • Abonamentul pe suport de hârtie: 

 

  • 330 lei pentru 6 luni;
  •   660 lei anual.

 

            Acest tip de abonament se poate face pe site-ul revistei „Dreptul“(la adresa www.revistadreptul.ro), şi se poate achita cu OP, cu mandat poştal cât și la furnizorii autorizaţi cu care redacţia revistei „Dreptul” are contract. Prețurile abonamentelor includ cheltuielile de distribuire. 

 

Notă: Preţul revistei per bucată este de 70 lei. 

 

  • Abonamentul pe suport electronic: 

 

  • 200 lei pentru 6 luni;
  • 325 lei anual.

 

 

            Acest tip de abonament se poate face pe site-ul revistei „Dreptul”(la adresa www.revistadreptul.ro), și se poate achita cu cardul bancar, prin OP sau cu mandat poștal.  

 

           Abonamentul electronic oferă utilizatorilor, pe lângă acces la numărul curent și acces la toate numerele revistei începând din 2010. Accesul la arhiva revistei este valabil atâta timp cât abonamentul este valid.  

Utilizatorii vor putea accesa revista de pe un singur telefon, o tabletă şi un laptop/desktop. 

Modalitatea prin care abonaţii la formatul online vor intra în posesia abonamentului este următoarea: 

  • Utilizatorul îşi face cont pe site-ul revistei; 
  • Acesta va achiziţiona abonamentul – plata se face online, pe site;
  • În funcţie de dispozitivul pe care doreşte să vizualizeze revista: 
  • Telefon / tabletă – se descarcă aplicaţia revistei din AppStore/ Google 

                Play; 

  • Laptop / Desktop – se descarcă de pe site-ul revistei aplicaţia - accesibilă  pe dispozitive cu sistem de operare Windows, MacOS sau Linux; 
  • Prin aplicaţie, utilizatorul se va autentifica (acelaşi cont creat la punctul 1); 
  • Automat, după logarea cu succes, utilizatorul va fi redirecţionat în secţiunea din care va putea vizualiza toate numerele revistei, începând cu anul 2010. 

 

Instrucțiuni amănunțite sunt disponibile pe site-ul revistei. 

 

Achiziţionarea de articole 

 

             Utilizatorii pot achiziţiona de pe site-ul revistei și articole separate la preţul de 15 lei per articol. Vor putea fi achiziţionate toate articolele disponibile în arhiva electronica a revistei. Revista este arhivată electronic începând cu anul 2010 şi până în prezent. 

  

Uniunea Juriștilor din România 

 

CIF 1576959 

IBAN RO16BRDE410SV21865234100, deschis la BRD – Sucursala Piața Romană. 

 

              Pentru a evita eventualele întârzieri în expedierea revistei, rugăm a fi transmise copii după documentele de plată pe adresa de mail financiar@ujr.ro.  

De asemenea, pentru orice fel de detalii puteți suna la numărul 0726.752.397 - Lidia Chivu, mail lidia.chivu@ujr.ro sau abonamente@revistadreptul.ro.