-
The archaeological sites – material forms of our past – are a finite and non-renewable resource of knowledge of our history, in a constant state of vulnerability to external factors that can lead to their irretrievable loss. Among these factors, the most destructive one that can be distinguished is the phenomenon of archaeological poaching as a source of supply to the national and international art markets. The illegal trafficking of cultural goods, often also involving activities of laundering of money or even of terrorism, is a widespread phenomenon worldwide. In order to fight it, the real protection offered to archaeological sites and museums, as well as ensuring the effectiveness of the instruments of international cooperation are the most effective means for defending the national cultural heritage. -
Savantul meu coleg D. Dimitrie Alexandresco, într’un studiu asupra art. 951 și 1157 Codul civil, studiu apărut în ziarul Dreptul Nr. 25, face istoricul protecțiunei minorilor la Romani, istoric care este de sigur incomplet, dacă nu și inexact în câte-va puncte esențiale. Pentru ca să urmez întrucât-va pe eminentul meu coleg, nu mă voi ocupa cu protecțiunea copilului nenăscut, care de la o epocă determinată a început a fi protegiat, lucru care a dat naștere maximei cunoscute: „infans conceptus pro nato habetur quoties de ejus commodis agitur”, maximă cu atâtea aplicațiuni în dreptul modern, ci voi trata numai despre mijloacele de protecțiune organisate de dreptul roman pentru minor, luându-l de la naștere și până la vârsta de 25 ani. -
The principle of the fairness of the administration of evidence represents the rule that prohibits the use of any strategy or maneuver which has as its object the administration of a piece of evidence in bad faith or which has the effect of provoking an offence to obtain a piece of evidence, if by these means the dignity of the person, his or her rights to a fair trial or privacy or professional secrecy are infringed. The object of the present study is only the examination of the last of the aspects of the principle of loyalty, as it is regulated by the Criminal Procedure Code, respectively „the entrapment to commit a crime”. We do not intend to make a detailed presentation of the jurisprudence of the European Court in this matter, but only to point out the general principles that should underlie the analysis to be carried out by the judiciary and to exemplify some solutions in judicial practice. Finally, we will try to draw attention to the delimitation between „entrapment to commit a crime” and „entrapment to evidence” and to establish exactly what is the procedural framework in which these aspects can be invoked. -
Part of EU law – both primary and especially secondary – waste problem is a complex multi-faceted one in its aspects. Since the first programs of action on the environment (EAP) – the first (1973–1977), the second (1977–1983) – to the last, the seventh such program (2013–2020) entitled A better environment for a better life, the challenge of waste is dealt with either issue on its own, or as part of wider objectives. Whatever the approach, solving subordinates to old or new principles of environmental law as formulated in the first EAP and then developed in other programs of action. These are: prevention is better than cure; EIA should be considered at an early stage of decision making; exploitation of nature by means of causing significant damage to the ecological balance should be avoided; scientific knowledge must be improved to allow for appropriate action; „polluter pays” principle, the polluter should bear the cost of prevention and environmental restoration after damage thereto; activities of a Member State shall not cause damage to the environment of other States. -
The 150th anniversary from the issue of „Dreptul” magazine, edited by Societatea Juridică (1871), the first representative publication, with a „programme” in the matter, represents the occasion to review the evolution of the juridical literature as vector of the science and culture of law in Romania, to capture its current state and to prefigure the perspectives of development. The juridical press has emerged and developed in our country as a tool for promoting knowledge of law, through the dissemination of the case law, the affirmation of the doctrine and of the dialogue of ideas. After an initial period marked by the spirit of imitation related to the massive legislative import that characterized the establishment of the foundations of the Romanian juridical modernity after 1859, the interwar juridical unification (judicial, constitutional-legislative, at the level of the regime of juridical professions and of the juridical higher education) favoured the transition to its own literature in the field and a national juridical culture with strong original and identity accents. Marked by a certain eclipse and by a perspective „planned” between 1949–1989, it experienced a strong recovery after 1990 by resuming its issue in new editions, along with Dreptul, and of the other two landmarks genre: Curierul Judiciar (founded in 1892) and Pandectele Române (since 1921) and the issue of new ones, currently facing the low tide and the unexpected challenges of the accelerated digitalization and neoliberal globalization.
-
This study examines – critically – the Romanian legal regulations regarding the termination of the term of office for a “local elected official”, which refers to: local advisors, county advisors, presidents and vice-presidents of county councils, the general mayor of the city of Bucharest, deputy mayors and the village delegate, who is also assimilated to local elected officials. Difficulties arise from the fact that the termination – upon expiry or prior to expiry – of the term of office for “local elected officials” in Romania is regulated, at present, directly or indirectly, by four laws, namely: Law no. 393/2004 on the status of local elected officials; Law no. 215/2001 (republished on 20 February 2007) on the local public administration; Law no. 161/2003 on ensuring transparency in carrying out public dignities, public functions and in the business environment, the prevention and sanctioning of corruption and in Law no. 144/ 2007 on the setting up, organizing and functioning of the National Integrity Agency. In order to avoid any difficulties generated by such a legislative system, the unification of regulations in this field is proposed (as well as some amendments to the laws) exclusively in the content of Law no. 393/2009 on the status of local elected officials. -
This study examines – critically – the Romanian legal regulations regarding the termination of the term of office for a “local elected official”, which refers to: local advisors, county advisors, presidents and vice-presidents of county councils, the general mayor of the city of Bucharest, deputy mayors and the village delegate, who is also assimilated to local elected officials. Difficulties arise from the fact that the termination – upon expiry or prior to expiry – of the term of office for “local elected officials” in Romania is regulated, at present, directly or indirectly, by four laws, namely: Law no. 393/2004 on the status of local elected officials; Law no. 215/2001 (republished on 20 February 2007) on the local public administration; Law no. 161/2003 on ensuring transparency in carrying out public dignities, public functions and in the business environment, the prevention and sanctioning of corruption and in Law no. 144/ 2007 on the setting up, organizing and functioning of the National Integrity Agency. In order to avoid any difficulties generated by such a legislative system, the unification of regulations in this field is proposed (as well as some amendments to the laws) exclusively in the content of Law no. 393/2009 on the status of local elected officials. -
Under art. 164 to 177 of the Civil Code the legislator regulates “the protection of the judicial prohibited” and “the placing under judicial interdiction procedure” under art. 935 to 940 of the Code of Civil Procedure; these texts essentially take over the old regulation provisions and also establish some updates, including that of determining jurisdiction in the matter in favor of the court guardianship, court which also takes over the guardianship authority duties. This study aims to explore and explain the legal rules above. -
The probative force of the document under private signature derives from the signature of the party or, as the case may be, of the parties. The signature of a document guarantees in full faith, until proved otherwise, the existence of the consent of the party that has signed it with regard to its content. In case of the document under private signature the presumption of authenticity will no longer operate. The person to whom it is opposed a document under private signature is obliged either to acknowledge, or to contest the writing or the signature, because, until it is voluntarily acknowledged or verified in court, one can not know whether the signature belongs or not to the person who appears in the document as signatory and whether or not he has knowledge of the content of the document. The document under private signature, acknowledged by the opposing party or considered by the law as acknowledged, makes proof between the parties until proved otherwise, including with regard to the mentions in the document which are directly related to the legal relation between the parties. On the other hand, the mentions in the document not related to the content of the legal relation between the parties can serve only as prima facie written evidence. The attitude of the party, to whom it is opposed a document under private signature, not to protest against the use of that document or not to give an opinion in one sense or the other, is presumed to be a tacit acknowledgment. In case the writing or the signature has been contested by the party or declared unknown by its heirs or successors in rights, the court will proceed to the verification of the document according to the provisions of Articles 301–303 of the Civil Procedure Code. However, if the party claims that the document has been forged after signing, by erasures, additions or corrections in its content, or that the document contains an intellectual forgery, the party in question will be able to denounce the document as false, by means of the procedure regulated by Articles 304–308 of the Civil Procedure Code. The document not signed by the parties or by one of the parties is not valid as instrumentum probationis, but the legal operation (negotium iuris) remains valid and can be proved by other means of evidence, if the written form is not required by law ad validitatem. Even the document not valid as document under private signature is worth as prima facie written evidence, if it is opposed to the party who wrote it. The documents under private signature (signed) for which the formality „plurality of copies” or, where appropriate, the formality „good and approved” has not been accomplished is always worth as prima facie written evidence. In the relations between professionals it is recognized the probative force of a document not signed, but commonly used in the exercise of the activity of an enterprise in order to establish a legal act, unless the law imposes the written form in order to prove the legal act itself. The date indicated in the document under private signature has the same probative value, in the relations between the parties, with the other mentions in the document. Against third parties, the date of the document under private signature, by itself, is not evidence. Only the certain date is opposable to third parties, a date obtained by one of the methods established in Article 278 of the Civil Procedure Code or by other means provided by law. -
The study addresses the issue of the role of the judicial power within the system of separation of powers in the state, as well as its interaction with the legislative power, respectively the executive power, mainly using the method of analysis and of the case study, respectively of the jurisprudential study. Starting from the necessity, justified in a democratic state, of the existence of a system of mutual control between the authorities called to exercise the power, the authors present the creative role of the judge, called upon to apply, by interpretation, his right and principles, to a situation of fact, pursuing the respect for citizens’ rights and freedoms. Certainly the necessity of limiting the abusive or arbitrary conduct in exercising the functions of any of the three powers of the state can only be achieved when mutual control is effective and guaranteed by the legal regulations, as well as by the institutional practice, based also on the principle of loyal collaboration between institutions and public authorities. The members of the judicial power must respect high standards of ethics and professionalism, and their independence and impartiality are guarantees of respecting their role in democratic regimes based on the principle of separation of powers. The paper presents aspects referring to the interaction of the judicial power with the legislative one and the executive one respectively, by analysing the relevant case law of the Constitutional Court, which has established the parameters of this relationship, so as to guarantee the respect for the functions assigned by the Fundamental Law to each power, respectively to respect the citizens’ freedoms and the prevention of arbitrariness in the exercise of power.
-
Prezentul Raport sintetizeazã activitatea Consiliului Uniunii Naţionale a Barourilor din România (în continuare U.N.B.R.) pânã la data întocmirii sale – 01 iunie 2010. Raportul nu poate şi nu are pretenţia de a evoca toate problemele rezolvate în mod curent de Consiliul U.N.B.R. şi organele profesiei subordonate acestuia (Comisia Permanentã a U.N.B.R. şi Preşedintele U.N.B.R.). Congresul avocaţilor este chemat sã decidã dacã în perioada analizatã Consiliul U.N.B.R şi-a îndeplinit obligaţiile şi şi-a exercitat drepturile prevãzute de Legea nr. 51/ 1995 pentru organizarea şi exercitarea profesiei de avocat (în continuare, Legea) şi Statutul profesiei de avocat, în conformitate cu hotãrârile Congresului precedent. -
Every 3 months, calculated from the beginning of the liquidation, the judicial liquidator must submit to the creditors’ committee a report on the funds obtained from liquidation and from the collection of claims, as well as a distribution plan between the creditors, if necessary. The report and the plan shall be recorded at the registry of the tribunal and shall be published in the Bulletin of Insolvency Procedures. The report shall also provide the payment of his fee and of the other expenses provided in Article 159 (1) point 1 or of Article 161 point 1 of the Law No 85/2014, as the case may be. The report on the funds obtained from liquidation and from the collection of claims shall include, at least, the following: the balance in the liquidation account after the last distribution; the collections made by the judicial liquidator from the sale of each asset and from the recovery of the claims; the amount of the interests or of other incomes benefiting to the debtors’ fortune, as a result of keeping the undistributed amounts in bank accounts or by administering the assets existing in the debtor’s fortune; the total of the cash amounts existing in the liquidation account.
