-
Transmiterea actului administrativ sancționator prin fax îndeplinește, în principiu, rigorile procedurale referitoare la comunicare, aceasta putând fi circumscrisã modalitãții la care se referã art. 86 alin. (3) teza finalã din Codul de procedurã civilã: „alte mijloace ce asigurã transmiterea textului actului și confirmarea primirii acestuia”. -
The study focuses on the analysis of the norms that regulate the subjects and the object of the protection of the topographies of the semiconductor products from the perspective of the Law no. 16/1995 with the further modifications and of the respective regulations from the Civil Code (Law no. 287/2009). The author reveals some aspects that were incoherently or ambiguously regulated as regards the approached topic and highlights the absence from the content of the special law (Law no. 16/1995) of some provisions misplaced in the Norms of application of this law. At the same time, in order to avoid the confusions in the analyzed case, the author formulates de lege ferenda proposals, in the view of eliminating the identified legislative imperfections.
-
Based on the “judges dialogue” concept (institutionalized communication between the judges of various courts and levels of jurisdiction), the above study authors extrapolate this concept by mainly analyzing the forms of this “dialogue” between the 18 existing Constitutional Courts from as many countries of the 28 European Union Member States.
-
The study deals with the directions of the very probable, and at the same time, the possible review of the Constitutional Court. The starting point in this analysis is to identify the Romanian specific in the control of constitutionality of the period before and after the Revolution of December 1989, compared to models offered by other member countries of the European Union. The review of criticisms that have been made ”to the Constitutional Court and the solution chosen by the Constituent Assembly of 1991 will lead in the final part of the study to the drafting of the possible solutions to be considered by the future constitutional review to make the constitutional justice in Romania more legitimate and more effective.
-
Along with punishments and educational measures, safety measures are part of the broad criminal sanctions category; however, the latter have a mostly preventive purpose, which is to prevent committing new crimes or other offenses provided by the criminal law. Special confiscation is a safety measure whose legal content is patrimonial, as it concerns certain assets related either to the committed deed or to the offender and which, if further left within the factual and legal circuit, could be used to commit new offenses provided by the criminal law. The mainly preventive aim of the special confiscation safety measure is achieved by the fact that, under the conditions and within the limits prescribed by law, property shall pass free of charge into State ownership so that any person may no longer possess or use them to commit other offenses provided by the criminal law.
-
Pursuant to the entry into force of the Civil Code (Law no. 287/2009, republished) on October 1, 2011, which repealed the Family Code, has also duly amended Law no. 119/1996 on Civil status documents, republished, and also the entry into force of Law no. 134/2010 on the Code of Civil Procedure, republished, the author examines in this study the legal provisions relating to dissolution of marriage by divorce through court proceedings, making several references to the courts ? recent relevant case law. Thus, this study examines the legal provisions regulated by Articles 373-374 and Articles 379-381 of the Civil Code and Articles 914-934 of the new Code of Civil Procedure.
-
Given the overwhelming importance of the family home in family economic relationships, the Civil Code authors found it necessary to establish, as an absolute novelty, a special legal regime for various legal acts of the spouses in relation to this house and furnishing or garnishing property thereof. Also, the Civil Code provides a regulation derogating from the common law regarding the rights of spouses on the rented house and in connection with the award of the lease benefit and joint ownership of the house in case of divorce. The new regulations are designed to eliminate, mainly, the causes for various doctrinal interpretations and non-unitary jurisprudential solutions generated by the ambiguities and gaps of previous legislation in the matter.
-
Recent legislative interventions have brought important innovations on mediation, and one of them has promoted the sanction of dismissing the claim as inadmissible in case of claimant’s failure to observe the obligation to participate in the briefing on the advantages of mediation. The author determines the conditions for applying this procedural sanction, which he considers extremely severe and even excessive. Inadmissibility for not participating in the briefing is being also examined in the light of the provisions of art. 21 of the Romanian Constitution, regarding the free access to justice and the provisions of art. 6 of the (European) Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Secondly, the author notes that the sanction of inadmissibility applies only to the claimant. He believes, however, that the respondent may be subject to a judicial fine should he/she fail to appear in the briefing, according to Art. 187 item 1 letter f) of the new (Romanian) Code of Civil Procedure entered into force on February 15, 2013.
-
1. ALEXE, IRINA – Aspecte privind mobilitatea înalților funcționari publici reflectate de jurisprudenþa instanțelor din România, în „Revista de drept public” nr. 1-2/2012, p. 90-102. Autoarea, în urma analizei reglementãrilor în vigoare și a jurisprudenței în domeniu, face urmãtoarea propunere de lege ferenda: se apreciazã ca fiind judicioasã introducerea formulãrii “principiul mobilitãții”, cu consecințele de rigoare, în primul rând aceea de a stabili un cadru programat întemeiat pe criterii clare și coerente în aplicarea principiului mobilitãții. -
Drept penal și procesual penal CERERE PRIVIND SESIZAREA CURȚII DE JUSTIȚIE A UNIUNII EUROPENE PENTRU PRONUNȚAREA UNEI HOTÃRÂRI PRELIMINARE. INADMISIBILITATE. În conformitate cu dispozițiile art. 267 paragr. 1 lit. a) si b) din Tratatul privind funcționarea Uniunii Europene, Curtea de Justiție a Uniunii Europene este competentã sã se pronunþe, cu titlu preliminar, cu privire la: a) interpretarea tratatelor și b) validitatea și interpretarea actelor adoptate de instituțiile, organele, oficiile sau agențiile Uniunii. Prin urmare, cererea privind sesizarea Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene pentru pronunțarea unei hotãrâri preliminare, referitoare la interpretarea unui act al Consiliului Europei, cum este Convenția penalã privind corupþia, adoptatã la Strasbourg la 27 ianuarie 1999, iar nu a unui tratat al Uniunii Europene sau act al instituțiilor, organelor, oficiilor sau agențiilor Uniunii Europene, este inadmisibilã.
-
1. Achitare nelegalã. Gradul de pericol social al unei infracțiuni. În cazul în care legea prevede, în mod expres, cã o anumitã faptã prezintã pericolul social specific unei infracțiuni, în orice condiții de comitere, instanța nu poate pronunța o soluție de achitare și de aplicare a unei sancțiuni cu caracter administrativ.
-
International treaties on human rights are, in relation to the common law, the most important human rights source of international law. In terms of geography, the international treaties under the cited matter are divided into treaties with universal vocation (UN system) and regional international treaties (European regional level, Inter-American, African and so on). In this study, the author refers to the specificity of the conventional sources within the Inter-American and African system, the Arab and Islamic world and within the CIS area.
