Esenţa principiului error communis facit ius, invocat de subdobânditorul cu titlu oneros pentru a obţine pãstrarea valabilitãţii titlului sãu, constã în faptul cã terţul dobânditor este învestit cu un drept de proprietate pe care însã nu-l primeşte nici de la adevãratul proprietar – cu care nu a contractat, nici de la proprietarul aparent – cu care a contractat, dar care nu deţinea dreptul –, ci direct de la lege. Aşadar, este un mod originar de dobândire a proprietãţii, iar nu unul derivat. Pentru ca o aparenţã sã fie creatoare de drept, se cer a fi întrunite mai multe condiţii, cumulativ: sã existe o eroare comunã şi invincibilã; subdobânditorul sã fie de bunã-credinţã; actul încheiat între proprietarul aparent şi terţul subdobânditor sã fie cu titlu oneros.

The article intends to examine the changes that the new Criminal Code brings to the matter of the enforcement of criminal law over time, mainly for the purpose of harmonizing the given provisions with the constitutional principles, as well as for facilitating their implementation. From this perspective, one can notice that the new Criminal Code has largely taken over the provisions currently in force, but has eliminated those contrary to the constitutional principles, such as, for instance, the provisions stipulating that the complementary punishments, the educational measures and the safety measures in the new criminal law are always retroactive for public interest reasons or the provisions regarding the facultative enforcement of the most favorable criminal law in the irrevocably judged cases. We also find the introduction among the provisions subject to the principle of the most favorable criminal law of the legislative instruments declared unconstitutional, as well as of the emergency ordinances approved by the Parliament with amendments, supplements or rejected, provided that they were in force during the period stipulated by the law text.

In the above study, the author makes an analysis of the majority shareholder’s right to exclude the other shareholders from the companies traded on a regulated capital market (a right that is generally known under the English name squeeze aut) both in the light of the European Union Directive 2009/25/EC of 21 April 2009, and according to the (Romanian) law no. 297/2009 on the capital market, reaching the conclusion that the exercise of this right serves the interests of minority shareholders as well.

This study examines – critically – the Romanian legal regulations regarding the termination of the term of office for a “local elected official”, which refers to: local advisors, county advisors, presidents and vice-presidents of county councils, the general mayor of the city of Bucharest, deputy mayors and the village delegate, who is also assimilated to local elected officials. Difficulties arise from the fact that the termination – upon expiry or prior to expiry – of the term of office for “local elected officials” in Romania is regulated, at present, directly or indirectly, by four laws, namely: Law no. 393/2004 on the status of local elected officials; Law no. 215/2001 (republished on 20 February 2007) on the local public administration; Law no. 161/2003 on ensuring transparency in carrying out public dignities, public functions and in the business environment, the prevention and sanctioning of corruption and in Law no. 144/ 2007 on the setting up, organizing and functioning of the National Integrity Agency. In order to avoid any difficulties generated by such a legislative system, the unification of regulations in this field is proposed (as well as some amendments to the laws) exclusively in the content of Law no. 393/2009 on the status of local elected officials.

By comparison, the author examines the role of national parliaments in the treaties establishing the European Communities, the European Union (subsequent to the Treaty of Amsterdam), and then, much more in detail, the role of national parliaments in the Treaty of Lisbon (effective since 1 December 2009). At the end, the author examines the (indirect) influence of the Treaty of Lisbon on the legislative deliberative process in the Parliament of Romania.

The Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the protection of the environment through criminal law, whose transposition into the domestic law must be carried out by 26 December 2010, obliges the EU Member States to provide in their national legislation for effective, proportional and dissuasive criminal penalties in respect of serious infringement of provisions of Community law on the protection of the environment. For the Romanian law, its application involves a substantial reform of the notion and regulations regarding offences related to the protection of the environment, for the purpose of properly incriminating the series of actions seriously affecting the environment, in a coherent vision, which would reflect the particularities of the field and, in particular, would ensure effective and discouraging penalties, able to contribute to achieving the objective set.