-
In this article, the author asserts with scientific and text arguments that, anytime art. 911 of the Criminal Procedure Code is interpreted as allowing the wire tapping or recording of calls or communications outside the criminal trial (namely without even starting in rem the criminal prosecution in rem), namely in the stage of preliminary acts, this is unconstitutional. -
The author examines the deviated offence in the broader framework of the real and not apparent plurality of offences. The author considers, contrary to the opinion expressed by the other Romanian authors, that for both its main forms – error in personam and aberratio ictus – the correct solution should be that of the concurrence of offences (an attempted offence in the representation of the perpetrator and an offence committed by fault) if in relation to the circumstances of the case, the defendant could and should have foreseen the actual result.
-
Dealing with the issue of the Romanian judge, as a guarantor of the public international law enforcement, the author discusses: the issue of the Romanian judge’s power to interpret the conventional international law; issues regarding difficulties in the enforcement of the public international law by the Romanian courts due to the absence of similar internal rules; decisions of the international courts of justice and their effects on the internal legal proceedings (Romanian).
-
Law no. 230/2007 on the establishment, organization and functioning of the owners’ associations, stipulates in art. 15: “Subject to a 5-day notice, the owner is obliged to accept the access to its apartment or to its space of a representative of the association, when it is necessary to inspect, repair or replace elements in joint ownership, which can be accessed only from the given apartment or space. Emergency situations, when access is possible without notice, shall be exempted”. In the above study, the author initially examines this text in relation to art. 27 of the Constitution of Romania regarding the inviolability of the home. Further on, he examines the requirements imposed by the same text for its legal enforcement; the situations in which the owner’s refusal to allow access – although the legal requirements are met – is an abuse of right and, in the end, other legal possibilities for the association dealing with the owner’s unjustified refusal to allow access.
-
Taking into consideration the provisions of art. 1385, paragraph 4 of the new Romanian Civil Code (adopted and published in 2009, but not yet effective), according to which “if the illicit action caused the loss of the opportunity to gain an advantage, the remedy shall be proportional to the probability of gaining such advantage, by also taking into consideration the circumstances and the actual situation of the victim, and by considering the rich French case law in the field (in the matter of medical liability) the author believes that, in Romania, tort liability could exist even at present (in particular in case of malpractice, as regards medical liability) following the damage caused by losing the opportunity to gain an advantage. For this reason, the author presents in detail the compensation conditions for such damage.
-
In this study, after a brief introduction on parental rights and obligations, the author examines, in the light of the legislation currently in force (Family Code – amended by Law no. 288/2007, and Laws no. 272/2004 and no. 273/ 2004), and in the light of the future Romanian Civil Code (published on July 24, 2009 but not yet into force), the status of parental rights and obligations, provided that the child has been legally entrusted to other persons, discussing, in this manner, with priority, the extent to which the parents are entitled to provide their consent to the marriage of their child (if the child is a minor) or to his/her adoption. -
The criminal offence of compromising the interests of justice, according to the new regulation, refers in particular to the respect and authority that needs to be attached to the performance of the act of justice, and such performance is protected by criminal law in two manners, both as regards the criminal offences committed by persons from outside the judicial system in the capacity of unqualified active subjects, and against the “abuses” of any nature committed, on the one hand, by the persons called to perform the act of justice and, on the other hand, by the public servants who, as a result of their work duties, learn about the producing of any evidence, the existence of any means of proof or official documents, which, by their disclosure or revealing, could obstruct or prevent the criminal proceeding, or could influence the order of a solution in the criminal proceeding stage.
-
The continuous evolution of the social-economic life and the diversification of the forms of action of criminal groups have required, both as regards criminal offences and domestically, the regulation of the criminal liability of the legal entity. Since crime, in general and economic-financial crime, in particular, is continuously growing, the indictment of the legal entity as active subject of the criminal offence was considered useful. The Romanian lawmaker also did this, first, by amending the Criminal Code in operation by means of Law no. 278/ 2006 and then by drafting a new Criminal Code, according to the European democratic legislation. Given the importance of this institution for the Romanian criminal legislation, we considered useful to make a demanding radiography of this issue.
-
The criminal offences against the safety of railway traffic are provided for in the new Criminal Code under Title VII “Criminal Offences against Public Safety”, Chapter I. Taking into account the critical observations expressed in our doctrine, starting with the year 2006, the lawmaker has amended and supplemented both two criminal offences as regards their names, and the content of the others. Regarding the content of criminal offences, we mention that the amendments made refer both to the capacity of active subject and to that of passive subject, which this time may belong to the employees of both State-owned and private-owned operators. Nevertheless, when identifying the most important social values and, subsequently, protecting them by means of criminal law rules, the lawmaker did not take into consideration the current legislation, both domestic and of the European Union regarding the safety of railway traffic and transports. Thus, the most important European and domestic regulations in this field, which had to be taken into consideration in the activity of legal individualization of criminal law penalties, are the Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 (the Railway Safety Directive) and Law no. 55/2006 on railway safety. The critical observations and the proposals made by the author refer precisely to the need to adapt the Romanian railway safety legislation to the European Union legislation.
-
According to the title of this study, the author carries out a thorough analysis of the legal institution of acquisitive prescription in the new Romanian Civil Code (Law no. 287/2009), a Code adopted by the Parliament (but not yet in force) in relation to the same legal institution, as it is legally configured in the Civil Code still in force (since 1865).
-
HOTÃRÂREA NR. 1 privind aprobarea RAPORTULUI DE ACTIVITATE AL CONSILIULUI U.N.B.R. (între Congresul avocaţilor 2009 şi Congresul avocaţilor 2010) Congresul Avocaţilor întrunit la 17 iunie 2010 în localitatea Mamaia, jud. Constanţa, constituit în conformitate cu dispoziţiilor art. 59 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 51/1995 pentru organizarea şi exercitarea profesiei de avocat, vãzând dispoziţiile art. 61 alin. (1) lit. a) din Legea nr. 51/1995 pentru organizarea şi exercitarea profesiei de avocat, dupã analiza şi dezbaterea Raportului de activitate al Consiliului U.N.B.R. (între Congresul avocaţilor 2009 şi Congresul avocaţilor 2010) astfel cum acesta a fost supus dezbaterii Corpului profesional al avocaţilor, începând cu data de 07 iunie 2010, afişat pe website-ul (www.unbr.ro), comunicat prin poşta electronicã la toate barourile şi, prin grija acestora, comunicat membrilor Congresului în forma prevãzutã de art. 14 alin. (5) din Regulamentul de organizare şi funcţionare a U.N.B.R. şi de desfãşurare a şedinţelor Consiliului U.N.B.R.,
-
Prezentul Raport sintetizeazã activitatea Consiliului Uniunii Naţionale a Barourilor din România (în continuare U.N.B.R.) pânã la data întocmirii sale – 01 iunie 2010. Raportul nu poate şi nu are pretenţia de a evoca toate problemele rezolvate în mod curent de Consiliul U.N.B.R. şi organele profesiei subordonate acestuia (Comisia Permanentã a U.N.B.R. şi Preşedintele U.N.B.R.). Congresul avocaţilor este chemat sã decidã dacã în perioada analizatã Consiliul U.N.B.R şi-a îndeplinit obligaţiile şi şi-a exercitat drepturile prevãzute de Legea nr. 51/ 1995 pentru organizarea şi exercitarea profesiei de avocat (în continuare, Legea) şi Statutul profesiei de avocat, în conformitate cu hotãrârile Congresului precedent.
