CONSIDERAȚII PE MARGINEA DECIZIEI NR. 369/2017 A CURȚII CONSTITUȚIONALE, REFERITOARE LA EXCEPȚIA DE NECONSTITUȚIONALITATE A SINTAGMEI „PRECUM ȘI ÎN ALTE CERERI EVALUABILE ÎN BANI ÎN VALOARE DE PÂNĂ LA 1.000.000 LEI INCLUSIV”, CUPRINSĂ ÎN ART. XVIII ALIN. (2) DIN LEGEA NR. 2/2013 PRIVIND UNELE MĂSURI PENTRU DEGREVAREA INSTANȚELOR JUDECĂTOREȘTI, PRECUM ȘI PENTRU PREGĂTIREA PUNERII ÎN APLICARE A LEGII NR. 134/2010 PRIVIND CODUL DE PROCEDURĂ CIVILĂ

The article analyzes the Decision of the Constitutional Court No 369/2017, by which the phrase „as well as in other requests assessable in cash worth up to ROL 1 000 000 inclusive” was declared unconstitutional. In the Civil Procedure Code, in Article 483 (2), there are listed the judgments that can not be challenged with recourse, among which there are the requests assessable in cash worth up to ROL 500 000. By Article XVIII of the Law No 2/2013, this threshold was increased to the amount of ROL 1 000 000 inclusive. We consider criticizable the establishing of the categories of court judgments that have eluded the recourse taking into account the value criterion and we propose to eliminate this criterion. In our opinion, we agree with the admission of the plea of unconstitutionality, which has eliminated the value threshold for the promotion of judgments that can be challenged with recourse. Likewise, we consider criticizable also the delimitation of the material competence between judges and tribunals, being based on the value criterion. In our opinion, the delimitation of the material competence must be made depending on the nature of the litigation brought to justice, not on the value criterion of the request for summons.