• According to art. 1088, paragraph 1 of the Romanian Civil Code (in force, “For obligations having as object any amount, damages for performance shall comprise only the legal interest, except for the special rules regarding trade, guarantees and companies”. The author criticizes this regulation that actually leads, in numerous situations, to damaging the creditor, if the maximum interest limit is lower than the amount of the damage caused by failure to perform or late performance of the obligation to pay an amount, showing that the above-mentioned legal solution, taken from the French Civil Code, is not presently provided in the Italian, German, Swiss and English systems. Moreover, the new Romanian Civil Code, published in July 2009, but not yet effective, stipulates (in art. 1535, paragraph 3) that, if the interest due (for failure to perform the pecuniary obligation in due time) does not cover the entire damage incurred, the creditor shall be entitled, in addition, to damages for any additional damage incurred due to debtor’s failure to perform the obligation. In the end, the author considers that the regulation of the possibility for reduction of damages by the court would not be opportune – at present – in Romania.
  • This study represents, in its essence, a micro-monograph regarding the right to image, a component of personality rights. In this respect, following a presentation regarding the “personality rights, in general”, the authors examine in detail the issue of the right to image (notion, basis, autonomy of the right to image, consent to the reproduction of one’s image, limits of the right to image, image contract, extinguishment of the right over image).
  • Human personality represents the synthetic expression of biological, psychological and social features, a result of the interaction of fundamental factors: heredity, environment and education. People cannot exist like isolated, single individuals, but only as individuals who are in a permanent cooperation with each other for the purpose of transforming the social environment. For this reason, the human being, as personality, reflects an entire ensemble of psychophysiological, moral and esthetic features and capacities, abilities etc. These factors of the human personality (genetic and acquired) mandatorily create the elements of human dignity: honor, which is an inborn attribute and reputation, which is an acquired attribute. For this reason, the protection of the dignity of the person has represented a subject of legal protection since the earliest times for all legislations, and only the content of incrimination or the penalty prescribed by the incriminatory rule has varied. At present, as well, human dignity represents a fundamental social value that needs to be protected since the normal development of social life is not possible without protecting this value. The European countries with modern legislation have regulated the incrimination of crimes against dignity. In the spirit of our tradition and of adapting the Romanian legislation to the European legislation, Romania is required to do the same thing. The grounds presented in this article represent arguments in this respect.
  • The author shows that, in the new regulation, the essential characteristic regarding the social danger entailed by the criminal action committed was removed from the definition of the crime. Instead, two new essential characteristics were introduced, namely: the action committed, which is provided by the criminal law, is unjustified and not imputable to the person having committed it. Also, reference is made to the correlation between the institution of the action provided by criminal law and the institution of the crime and the essential characteristics of the crime are examined.
  • The author notices that the new definition of the material element of the objective side of the crime is clearer than the current wording. Unlike the current regulation regarding the sexual intercourse, of any type, in the new wording of the incriminatory rule, the lawmaker refers distinctively to the sexual intercourse, the oral or anal sex, in case of the form of crime, and distinctively to any other acts of vaginal or anal penetration, in case of the assimilated form of crime. The passive subject of the crime may be, in the new wording of the incriminatory rule as well, any person irrespective of gender, age, civil status, including the perpetrator’s wife. The aggravation of the crime is triggered by six aggravation causes, unlike the four in the current Criminal Code, following the provision of new forms of aggravation or the redefinition of aggravation causes in the case of rape against a relative in direct line or against a brother or sister; rape against a minor under 16 years of age; rape committed for producing pornographic materials; rape resulting in the injury of the victim. The incrimination of attempted rape proves the inconsistency of the lawmaker. The system of penalties provided by the new Criminal Code raises the question of enforcing the more favorable criminal law.
  • The article is designed to examine the amendments introduced by the new Criminal Code in the matter of law enforcement in the territory. From this perspective, we notice that the principle of territoriality is supplemented with additional provisions for defining the notions of offense and territory. The principles of personality and reality were adjusted so that they could be effective, yet without burdening the judicial bodies uselessly, and the principle of universality of the criminal law was reformulated in order to apply only to the situations for which the Romanian State has undertaken obligations internationally. New elements were also introduced as regards the international cooperation legal instruments, such as the delivery of persons to another European Union Member State or to an international court, changes that seem justified in the light of international treaties to which Romania is a signatory party.
  • En la generalidad de las legislaciones societarias actuales, se establece algún tipo de régimen que limita la realización de distribuciones a los socios por parte de la sociedad durante el transcurso de la vida social (durante societate)1. Este régimen forma parte de las medidas que se adoptan legalmente en las sociedades que limitan la responsabilidad de los socios2, para proteger ex ante o preventivamente a los acreedores sociales.
  • The regulation of crimes in the field of the illegal removal and transplant of organs, tissues and cells of human origin at the level of each country is extremely important due to the big social danger of these crimes and the importance of the social values protected by their incrimination, values regarding the life and the physical and mental integrity of the members of society, as well as the respect due to the memory of deceased persons. In this respect, at the level of the European Union, the Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 31 March 2004, on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells was adopted. There are numerous European countries in which the crimes in the field of the illegal removal and transplant of organs, tissues and cells of human origin are incriminated in the Criminal Code. Their experience should also be followed by Romania, where, at present, the field is regulated by Law no. 95/2006 on healthcare reform, as subsequently amended and supplemented.
  • The author examines synthetically the changes brought to the institutional structure of the European Union by the Treaty of Lisbon. For this purpose, the author presents the essential institutional changes brought to: the European Parliament; the European Council; the Council; the European Commission (the Commission); the Court of Justice of the European Union.
  • The author states that the criminal trial should take place with celerity, within a reasonable period of time, according to art. 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In this context, the submission by the defendants of applications to notify the Constitutional Court of exceptions of unconstitutionality that were previously dismissed numerous times represents an abuse of right committed for the purpose of procrastinating the resolution of the cases.
  • As regards the possibility to maintain conditional release if, following a merger of penalties, a penalty equal to that from which the convict was released on parole is enforced, two solutions are possible. The first solution consists in deducting only the actually served penalty and incarcerating the convicted person again, and the second solution consists in considering the entire penalty served. The resolution of the controversy depends on the opinion adopted as regards the legal nature of conditional release.
  • After examining the criminal rules contained in the Government Emergency Ordinance no. 202/2002, the authors formulate several proposals de lege ferenda regarding the crimes regulated by this piece of legislation.
Folosim fisierele tip cookie-uri pentru a va oferi cea mai buna experienta de utilizare a website-ului. Navigand in continuare ori ramanand doar pe aceasta pagina va exprimati acordul asupra folosirii cookie-urilor. Daca doriti sa renuntati la acestea, va rugam sa consultati Politica de Utilizare a Cookie-urilor. Anumite parti ale website-ului nu vor mai functiona corect daca stergeti toate cookie-urile. Citește mai mult... Ok