-
If from a quantitative point of view the repressive (criminal) law of the environment is increasing, the criminal response as a tool to promote environmental protection is still far from rising at the level of the urgency and magnitude of the ecological problems to which it is called to answer. The causes are related to the insufficient conceptual-regulatory adjustment to the particularities of the field, the concurring strong interests of different nature and the complexity of the theoretical and practical approach to be undertaken. Bringing the repressive right to the level of the mission and current priorities implies a radical reform on the general conception and approach, the unitary and adequate register of incriminations, the particularization of the procedural framework for investigating cases and for applying sanctions and the professionalization and specialization of the jurisdictions. Assimilating the meanings of the precautionary principle, building one’s own criminal regime, by overcoming administrative dependence and consecrating the ecological finality, incriminating the ecocide, in a word the need for another penalty is the key to overcome the impasse and the way to a new, genuine and effective repressive environmental law. In Romania, there is a need for a general rethinking of the relevant normative system through a unitary regulation to include the essential aspects of an adequate incrimination, customized procedures and specialized jurisdictions. -
The idea of recognizing nature’s legal capacity, with the consequence of attributing this entity of rights, began to be conveyed some time ago in the specialized literature. With all criticism, the theory has taken a certain shape and has even been included in the legislations, as is the case of Ecuador, which in 2008, by Constitution, Articles 71–74, recognized the law of nature, of the environment in general. Bolivia has adopted legal provisions, but not with constitutional power and, at the same time, has proposed a draft Universal Declaration of Nature Rights, which quickly gained adherence both at the level of states and in specialized literature with moderate optimism because it is stated that „we must be aware that the statement such as the one proposed cannot be expected to have immediate results”. The granting of rights to nature, as a new approach to the law of the environment that conceptualizes the natural, non-human world, as something worthy of protection for its own good, and not just as something that can be used for the benefit of the people, appeared in response to the failure of the model anthropocentric environment protection, also has its place in interesting processes.
-
This study examines the following issues: the legal nature of the survivor’s pension, the possibility of obtaining the survivor’s pension by a person, if his legal provider was also the holder of a survivor’s pension, how to calculate the survivor’s pension in case it is established, having as legal reference another survivor’s pension, the possibility of applying the correction index when establishing the amount of the survivor’s pension. The beginning of a relatively detailed legal analysis, in connection with these aspects presents a relevant degree of novelty for the Romanian legal literature, as neither the doctrine, nor the case law paid due attention to these problems, of indisputable theoretical interest and real practical utility.
-
The following study critically analyzes the civil liability of the civil servants. It is estimated that it is about a contractual liability, however different from the patrimonial liability and from the material liability, regulated in the case of employees, respectively of the military and of other categories of personnel. The cases of civil liability of the civil servants are presented, as well as the conditions of this form of liability. Special attention is paid to the procedure of reparation of damages (imputation order or disposition and the payment commitment), including with regard to the former civil servants. Key words: payment commitment; authority; public institution; imputation decision/disposition/order; illicit deed; civil servant; obligation of restitution; injury; civil liability; material liability; patrimonial liability; guilt.
-
In the first part of the study, the author emphasizes the importance of the legal remedies for making justice more efficient, one of the important objectives of any reform programme in the field. The finding is natural, since a good regulation of the legal remedies can make a substantial contribution to the resolution of the trials within a reasonable time, in order to use only a unanimously accepted phrase. The general tendency of the contemporary procedural regulations is to carry out a simplification of the legal remedies and to avoid congestion of the courts, especially the courts of appeal and the supreme courts. For this purpose, the vast majority of the analyzed regulations establish some limitations – value-wise – of the exercise of the legal remedies or establish means of filtering the reviews, and in some countries even of the appeals. The author also notes that in some procedural systems the ordinary legal remedy of the appeal cannot be exercised in low value disputes. One of the author’s conclusive remarks is that the filtering systems of some legal remedies are efficient and contribute to the resolution of processes with celerity. Another final conclusion is that the Romanian legislator has abandoned such an approach, and this should be reconsidered in the future.
-
In this article, we intend to present, first of all, the particularities of the on-the-spot investigation, and then to deal with the way of drawing up a report, regarding those found on the spot and the importance of such evidence for solving cases. Also, depending on the discussions held, in our presentation, we will examine the themes raised by applying Articles 345–347 of the Civil Procedure Code; the situations in which the court, which travels on the spot, cannot conclude the investigation on the appointed day; the issue of the rogatory commission and the manner of drawing up the minutes. Current probation law provides the on-the-spot investigation with the conduct of operations and findings to be recorded in a report, which also shows the presence or absence of the parties. We appreciate that, for a fair trial, the deadlines for which the judge goes to that place on the second or even the third day must be mentioned. Although it is not a legal provision for the on-the-spot investigation by the letter rogatory, there are requests, according to the rules of common law, by which the courts support each other, to establish the truth accurately. Because the on-the-spot investigation is direct evidence of the facts, the minutes must be drawn up meticulously during on-the-spot investigations. In our analysis we also turn to generically related information, which cannot be a means of probation allowed by our system.
-
During the state of emergency both some press articles and the official communiques of the prosecutor’s offices mentioned the criminal investigation in the case of persons who, being confirmed as infected with SARS-CoV-2, refused to be hospitalized. The present study does not aim to provide a classic analysis of the crime of thwarting disease control, but is limited to trying to find an answer to the question of whether it is possible to retain this criminal offence in the case of infected persons who refuse hospitalization. As such, this paper discusses the current Romanian legislation and concludes that, having regard to both the provisions of the Protocol for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 virus infection and the systematic interpretation of the legal framework, since the Minister of Health enacted only measures to prevent and manage the emergency generated by the pandemic, as well as the obligation to diagnose the symptomatic persons, the measure of hospitalization cannot result exclusively from the unilateral will of the doctor, in reality the will of the latter playing no role, but must derive from the law in order to impose itself on both the patient and the doctor. Therefore it cannot be retained the crime of thwarting disease control in the case of infected persons who refused to be hospitalized.
-
The present paper aims to examine the „positive” conditions of the procedure of the right to damage repair in case of miscarriage of justice, i.e. those provided only in paragraph (1) of Article 538 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The paper begins with the delimitation of the area of analysis, after which it examines the conceptual reason of the analyzed procedure. Then, the conditions and subconditions found in paragraph (1) of Article 538 of the Criminal Procedure Code are treated by turns. Finally, after analyzing the concept of miscarriage of justice, we take a look at countries with similar legislation: the Republic of Moldova and Switzerland. At the same time, through this material, I am trying to demonstrate, by identifying the problems of interpretation of this paragraph, the fact that the action for damage repair provided in Chapter VI of the Criminal Procedure Code must comply, at least in the light of paragraph (1) of Article 538 far too restrictive conditions. The conditions which this paragraph involves turn the procedure of repair of the material damage or of the moral damage in case of miscarriage of justice into a non-feasible procedure with conditions which presuppose an insignificant stake, as compared to the reparation of the damage in case of the principal’s liability for the deed of his agent, a liability much easier to prove by the damaged person.
-
În cele ce urmează, vom comenta două hotărâri ale Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene, ambele pronunțate în materia dreptului la liberă circulație și, respectiv, a securității sociale, în cadrul procedurii chestiunii preliminare.
-
Transferul dreptului de proprietate sau legătura contractuală dintre cedent și cesionar nu reprezintă condiții sine qua non pentru existența transferului de întreprindere în accepțiunea Directivei 2001/23/CE astfel cum a fost interpretată prin hotărârile Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene și, deși prevăzute de dreptul intern, nu își pot produce efectele în contra scopului directivei, prin restrângerea domeniului de aplicare.
-
Potrivit art. 181 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 78/2000, folosirea sau prezentarea cu rea-credință de documente ori declarații false, inexacte sau incomplete, dacă fapta are ca rezultat obținerea pe nedrept de fonduri din bugetul general al Uniunii Europene sau din bugetele administrate de aceasta ori în numele ei, se pedepsește cu închisoare de la 2 la 7 ani și interzicerea unor drepturi.
