SUNTEM ÎN PREZENȚA UNEI CONTRADICȚII ÎNTRE CONCEPȚIA „MONISTÔ A NOULUI COD CIVIL, PE DE O PARTE, ȘI PREVEDERILE ART. 2557 ALIN. (2) DIN ACELAȘI COD, COROBORATE CU EXISTENȚA DISCIPLINEI JURIDICE A DREPTULUI COMERȚULUI INTERNAȚIONAL, PE DE ALTà PARTE?

Reiterating his view [in that the commercial law is not an autonomous branch of law, but is part of the Romanian civil law, with effect from 1 October 2011, since the new Romanian Civil Code entered into force (Law no. 287/2009, as republished) Code essentially “of monistic nature”], the author criticizes the view (to the contrary) of certain theorists and practitioners, focusing on art. 2557 para. (2) of the Code, as well as the existence – undisputed – of the legal discipline called the international trade law.