SUCCINTE SUBLINIERI CU PRIVIRE LA CORECTA INTERPRETARE ȘI APLICARE A ART. 65 DIN CODUL MUNCII ÎN SITUAȚIA CONCEDIERII INDIVIDUALE

The author criticizes a decision of the Bucharest Court of Appeal which, having to settle a case concerning dismissal determined by the dissolution of the workplace of an employee for reasons not related to him/her, stated that the dismissal is lawful even if it was not the position of the dismissed employee that was dissolved but another position of the same kind, but, on the other hand, it has decided that the measure in question is unlawful on grounds of not being „serious” since the employer (a ministry) has not proven the objective criteria that should support the seriousness of the applicant’s removal from the position held (the reason why the employee was not good enough or sufficiently trained in the profession in order to be maintained in activity or why the other employees maintained in activity were better suited, professionally or otherwise, as compared to the ones selected for dismissal).