RĂSPUNDEREA DOCTORANDULUI ȘI A COMISIEI DE SUSȚINERE PUBLICĂ A TEZEI DE DOCTORAT PENTRU ÎNCĂLCAREA REGULILOR DE DEONTOLOGIE ÎN ACTIVITATEA DE ÎNTOCMIRE A TEZEI DE DOCTORAT, ASTFEL CUM ESTE REGLEMENTATĂ ÎN LEGEA EDUCAȚIEI NAȚIONALE NR. 1/2011, HOTĂRÂREA GUVERNULUI NR. 681/2011 PRIVIND CODUL STUDIILOR UNIVERSITARE DE DOCTORAT. NATURA JURIDICĂ A RĂSPUNDERII, SANCȚIUNILE ȘI CONSECINȚELE ACESTEIA

The doctoral studies consist of two components developed under the guidance of a doctoral coordinator, namely a training programme based on advanced university studies, as well as an individual scientific research programme. The doctorate is finalised with the public presentation of a paper elaborated by the doctoral student. The doctoral thesis must demonstrate to have the advanced scientific knowledge of the topic addressed, must contain elements of originality in the development or solving of the topic, as well as modalities of scientific validation thereof. In order to fulfil the condition of public presentation of the doctoral thesis it is required an evaluation both from the guidance commission within the doctoral school and from the commission of public presentation of the doctoral thesis within the doctoral school. Evaluation is a complex process, which has as finality to form the belief that the doctoral studies have achieved their purpose by certifying the merit, value, meaning of the respective paper. The failure to comply with good conduct in research, including the plagiarizing of the results or publications of other authors, producing results or replacing the results with fictitious data, brings about the failure to obtain the agreement of public presentation of the paper. The legal nature of liability for violating the rules of deontology in the preparation of doctoral thesis is diverse, from the disciplinary liability to the criminal liability.