DESPRE UTILITATEA REGLEMENTĂRII UNEI PROCEDURI SIMPLIFICATE DE JUDECATĂ ÎN DREPTUL PROCESUAL CIVIL

7 years after the entry into force of the new Civil Procedure Code, without claiming to make
an exhaustive inventory of what could partially be called a failure of regulation and/or of
application, the legal institutions and the judicial procedure with a new face, perhaps even
revolutionary, or those only reformed and/or refurbished regulated by the new Civil Procedure
Code have demonstrated successively or simultaneously their insufficiency or inefficiency, some
being dysfunctional due to their own internal causes, others due to external causes referring, as a
rule, to the absence of the adequate human, material and financial resources or simply as a result
of the deformation by acclimatization by the courts, parties and participants in the civil trial, the
examples being numerous.
Under these circumstances, the necessity to regulate within the new Civil Procedure Code of a
simplified court procedure results from the very materiality of the facts. The specificity of this
simplified court procedure would be that it would imply to exclusively go through the written stage of
the civil trial, possibly of a written stage more extensive than the current one regulated by Article 201
of the Civil Procedure Code, at the end of which the date of pronouncing the judgment will be
established by administrative resolution. In this way, the duration for solving some cases with a
medium or low complexity would be significantly shortened, by eliminating the time period between
the date of completion of the written stage and the first trial term