CONSIDERAȚII ASUPRA RAPORTULUI JURIDIC DE MUNCÃ AL FUNCȚIONARILOR PUBLICI, PRECUM ȘI ÎN LEGÃTURÃ CU TIPOLOGIA RAPORTURILOR JURIDICE DE MUNCÃ ȘI CU O VIZIUNE MONISTÃ ASUPRA OBIECTULUI DREPTULUI MUNCII

The author, starting from a personal opinion, expressed in a previous study (published in the year 2000), namely that the employment relationship of the public servant represents a typical form of a legal employment relationship, a relationship that, although different from the individual employment contract (the archetype of the legal employment relationship), is not yet essentially different from the latter and, consequently, from a logical and legal point of view, the employment relationship of the public servant is a basic component of the labor law (legislation), emphasizes afterwards that, in recent years, one can note, from the legal point of view, a continuous reduction of differences between the legal employment relationship of employees and that of public servants. Further on, the author presents the typology of the current legal employment relationships, namely: the legal relationship of employees (generated by the conclusion of the individual employment contract, regulated by the Labor Code); the legal employment relationship of public servants (generated by Law no. 188/ 1999 on the Statute of Public Servants or by some statutes regarding special categories of public servants such as, for instance, police officers, diplomats and consuls, customs personnel etc.); the legal employment relationship of career military personnel (non-commissioned officers and officers – Law no. 80/1995); the legal relationship of persons holding a public office position; the legal employment relationship of magistrates (whose statute is subject to Law no. 303/ 2004); the legal employment relationship between the cooperative company and the cooperative members (Law no. 1/2005). As regards this typology of legal employment relationships, the author believes it is fundamentally erroneous to limit the object of labor law exclusively to the legal employment relationship of employees (regulated by the Labor Code), and firmly believes that all the above-mentioned legal employment relationships are, in his monist vision of the labor law, components of the Romanian labor law, whose summa divisio is made of the common labor law (regarding the legal employment relationship of employees, based upon the individual employment contract that is regulated mainly by the Labor Code provisions) and, on the other hand, of the special labor law (comprising the legal employment relationships of civil and military servants, persons holding public office positions, magistrates and cooperative members), a special labor law focused on regulations other than the Labor Code, but for which the Labor Code still represents common law.