In this study, the author analyzes the possibility of granting the public judicial aid, according to the national legislation and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, regarding the bail necessary to be paid in the cases regarding the provisional suspension of enforcement, according to Article 719 (7) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Regarding the situation prior to pronouncing the decision in the Case S.C. ECO INVEST S.R.L. and Ilie Bolmadar versus Romania, special attention is paid to the way of transposing the Directive of the Council of the European Union 2003/8/EC to improve the access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing some minimum common rules relating to the legal aid for such disputes, as well as the jurisprudential reversal of the Case Micallef versus Malta. At the same time, there are emphasized the relevant provisions of the Government Emergency Ordinance No 51/2008 on judicial public aid in civil matters.
AU INSTANȚELE PREROGATIVA DE A ACORDA AJUTOR PUBLIC JUDICIAR ÎN PRIVINȚA CAUȚIUNII PREVĂZUTE DE ART. 719 ALIN. (7) DIN CODUL DE PROCEDURĂ CIVILĂ, DUPĂ PRONUNȚAREA DE CĂTRE CURTEA EUROPEANĂ A DREPTURILOR OMULUI A DECIZIEI DIN CAUZA S.C. ECO INVEST S.R.L. ȘI ILIE BOLMADAR CONTRA ROMÂNIEI?
15.00lei