Presently, Article 527 (1) of the Civil Code, materializing a jurisprudential solution and a doctrinal thesis substantiated under the influence of the Family Code, provides that „only the person who has the means to pay or has the possibility to acquire these means may be forced to provide maintenance” (s.n. – T.B.). This text, in relation to the provisions of Article 42 (2) c) of the Constitution, raises the question of the possibility of forcing to labour the debtor of the legal maintenance obligation, who is fit to work, but who, for reasons imputable to him, does not earn incomes from work, nor has any other means to meet this obligation”. Despite some contrary opinions, the proposed study is intended as a contribution to the logicallegal argumentation of this „legal possibility”.
DISCUȚII ASUPRA POSIBILITĂȚII OBLIGĂRII LA MUNCĂ A DEBITORULUI OBLIGAȚIEI LEGALE DE ÎNTREȚINERE, APT DE MUNCĂ, DAR CARE, DIN MOTIVE IMPUTABILE LUI, NU OBȚINE VENITURI DIN MUNCĂ ȘI NICI NU DISPUNE DE ALTE MIJLOACE PENTRU EXECUTAREA ACESTEIA
15.00lei